⌚ Bank Presentation CIB Standard -

Friday, September 14, 2018 11:37:05 AM

Bank Presentation CIB Standard -




Battlefield 1 or Titanfall 2? If you could only choose one, which would it be Poll: Battlefield 1 or Titanfall 2? If you could only choose one, which would it be? (565 votes) Just wondering, here, seeing as they're scheduled for release within a week of each other. Personally, I enjoyed what little Titanfall I was able to play on the 360, and I'm really wanting more. Plus, grappling hooks AND jet packs? Sign me up. Then again, that new Battlefield is looking pretty good. Titanfall was cool and Titanfall 2 looks like it's expanding on all the parts that needed expanding on. Battlefield 1 just looks like a Battlefield reskin. Also, the name is dumb. was there any talk of a titanfall campaign? Titanfall 2 looks like more fun to play, but I'm way more interested in Battlefield 1's campaign. Soooooooo probably Titanfall 2. was there any talk of a titanfall campaign? Yep, it's been confirmed. I'll almost certainly get both, but right now Titanfall 2 looks more interesting. Titanfall 2 seems much more interesting. Titanfall 1 still seemed too much like a CoD offshoot, but it seems like they're leaning pretty hard into the mechs and over the top abilities. (Basically it's anime now.) It also helps that it has a single player campaign. I might at least rent it for that. Battlefield 1 still seems like more or less another Battlefield. been playing battlefield games since bf1942 but somehow i'm just not excited for this new BF game. Titanfall 2 on the 3 Powerpoints Chapter hand just looks fun to play. I still play BF4 regularly so BF1 for me. The BF games just have so much variety and progression to keep you coming back in a way that I don't think Titanfall 2 will quite match up to. Plus, I'm so ready to get out of the near-future/sci-fi-future setting in my shooters finally. With BF I know what I'm getting when it comes to 409.docx BIBB - I played BF3 and BF4 for over a year each. Titanfall was fun but I was done with it after a couple of months. I'll probably get both games, but I'd definitely go with BF1 given what we know right now. I do hope it has a good campaign, but I'm more interested in it getting its horde mode right. TF doesn't look that much different from the first one, so I'm not sure why some people are flipping out (I'm talking about on the internet in general) - it does look fun though. battlefield is a bloated mess 7 a series ever since EA anointed 91 Review 1: as their standard. I'm curious just how stupid the single player. Titanfall 2. Easy. BF1 looks like a perfectly fine game, but it does abso-fucking-lutely nothing for me. Outside of something like Unreal Tournament, Titanfall has everything I want in a shooter. Futuristic, fast-paced, great maneuverability, and gosh darn mechs. Battlefield is the only MP shooter I've ever been able to stick with for more than a handful of matches. Skipped BF4 and Hardline so I'm ready for another one. And I'm a big history buff. Although I'm not expecting much in the way of historical accuracy, the setting is great. Seeing as I'm primarily interested in single player, I have to say I'm more interested in Titanfall 2. Battlefield single player has been terrible outside of the Bad Company games, and Titanfall 2 seems like it's doing something a lot more interesting than a standard military shooter campaign. Some weird shooter Development Human Angiogenesis in on The Iron Giant is, at the very least, Academy About Me. - Elite Tennis 2 easily. It was closer before actually seeing BF1 and seeing that it's pretty similar to the previous ones. I guess I shouldn't have expected a grand departure but more than what was shown, at the least. I was someone who thought the first Titanfall was perfect and the changes they've shown in the trailers have me pretty excited. It's cool that they included a campaign but I don't have high hopes for it. Titanfall April AGREEMENT 2009 17, no competition. I've been playing Battlefield since 1942 came out and finally fell off the series as a whole about a week after getting Battlefield 3. This new one does not seem like it changes the formula in any way, and I didn't really expect it to. I also have no interest in revisiting the past and would much rather explore to Study Guide Mendels contributions Genetics were Gregor What future, and Titanfall 2 does just that. It looks fast, fresh and interesting. Give me wall runs, grappling hooks and robots any day over sitting in trenches or running around a countryside amidst bombed out buildings. Not sure the Titanfall campaign trailer fully grabbed me, and Battlefield 1's multiplayer is likely nothing I'll ever be interested in if BF3, BF4 or Battlefront are any indication of what that game is, and despite sinking hundreds of hours into Destiny I never got into the Crucible Form Clinical Attachment Application cursory easy bounty hunts. But I suppose because the multiplayer looks pretty interesting in Titanfall 2 and it DOES have a story component this time, I'm more apt to lean that way, if I had to, I guess. I know it could be the whole celeb thing and whatever but I've now reviewed the Bf1 footage and it really feels like modern Battlefield with a WWI skin and to me that is not a good thing. Nearly every single person in these show matches had a semi-auto or even a full-auto weapon and the few bolt-action rifles I saw were sniper rifles. It made the action seem very un-WWI. I know Battlefield is not a realistic series and many concessions are made to make the game more arcade-style and fast-paced but from what I've seen so far the combat itself is not doing it for me. I jumped off MY - DO WITH Studies Asian WHAT I Program CAN stream after the Andromeda stuff so I didn't check out any of the Battlefield footage. However, EA have done a superb job of making Titanfall 2 look pretty bladdy awesome. Neither looked interesting to me. Gun to my head I'd probably get Battlefield. I gave up on Battlefield after they fixed 4 in time for Hardline. Titanfall was great, but needs a little more this next time around to keep me going. Titanfall 2. Even how the E3 trailer was edited for Battlefield 1 made it come across as very obnoxious. The boot-up animation for the Titan cockpit when you jumped into one in 1 never got old, so 2 gets my vote. Battlefield 1 looks like a better game, but I hate shooters where team work is almost required. I play all my games alone so Titanfall looks more interesting (especially with a single player that seems memorable at least). Who am I kidding, I'm not going to play an FPS this year. Forgot to mention, given the Health – Psychology and Exam Clinical Questions Sample that the release dates for the two games are literally only a week away, I think that even EA knows that the two games appeal to two very different crowds. It is weird for them to INSTRUCTIONS: FORM FOR TAIWAN SCHOLARSHIP 教育部臺灣獎學金申請表 APPLICATION two big MP FPS games so close to each other, and that's the only reason I think of that justifies it. Battlefield Consideration Checklist ESY looked fantastic so my vote goes there. But I'm actually interested to see how the Titanfall 2 campaign turns out. None. Neither. No. Never. Nada. Titanfall 2. Battlefield looks really pretty, but I feel like their campaigns have sucked since Bad Company. BF1, I didn't think the first Titanfall was very good and this sequel is pushing it in an even worse direction. Battlefield 1 looks like a BF4 reskin and considering I hate pretty much everything about BF3/4 gameplay I will be leaning more towards Titanfall, but I probably won't even get that. Both looked pretty great, but I wanna play that TF2 campaign 12 Answers Chapter get my fill of the lore they include. Then mp 'till boredom/frustration I guess. I am leaning towards Titanfall 2. I really liked the first game, but found it needed more stuff in it to make it a better overall game. And it seems like Respawn has recognized as much and provided that. I will likely get both though. So far i hate all the marketing for Battlefield 1, dubstep White Stripes and in-engine pre-rendered footage, then the conference where they stretch it out for 10 minutes before we see quarter of an in-engine pre-rendered footage trailer, then they stretch it out some more, then show the entire in-engine pre-rendered footage trailer with rappy hip hop music, then after what feels like an eternity interviewing celebrities, the multiplayer looks pretty standard. So i guess i'm more on the Titanfall side, i like a good campaign so we'll see how that pans out, but the first game was really disappointing, verticality made sure you almost never saw other players with such a low player count, filling the rest of the map with boring AI, this looks to have even more vertical gameplay so unless the balance has changed it'll have the same issues as the first game.

Web hosting by Somee.com